Legal Opinion

State of Missouri v. David K. Holman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 6, 2016No. SC95613PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge W. Draper Iii, Judge

The state brings this interlocutory appeal, pursuant to section 547.200.1(3), RSMo 2000, 1 after the trial court sustained David K. Holman’s (hereinafter, “Defendant”) motion to suppress statements he made to police after his arrest. The state claims that Defendant’s statements were suppressed improperly because Defendant failed to unequivocally assert his Fifth Amendment right to counsel.

This Court holds that Defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights were not violated. Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded.

Factual and Procedural Background

' In determining…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Marvin D. RiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. State v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. StricklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. NEIL N. HOWLANDMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API