Legal Opinion
State v. Birmingham
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 2004No. 25610PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
Harold Birmingham (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202. 1 Defendant contends the trial court committed reversible error when it denied his motion to suppress certain statements and evidence and allowed their admission into evidence during his jury trial. In addition, Defendant argues that, in the absence of the statements and evidence which should have been suppressed, the State failed to present sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction.
We agree that Defendant’s statements were erroneously…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Washington v. ChrismanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RamiresMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. NewberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.