Legal Opinion

Bell v. Union Pacific Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 13, 1913No. Gen. No. 17,731PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph Z. Uhlir, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1911.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error, plaintiff below, commenced an action of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago against plaintiff in error, defendant below, to recover for damage to seventy-three head of cattle shipped by plaintiff from Rock River, Wyoming, to South Omaha, Nebraska. Plaintiff claimed damages in the sum of $770.36, and it was stated that the same were incurred “by reason of the failure of said defendant to exercise the care required of it of the said cattle while in its possession, custody and control.” The case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wald v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R. R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Sandy v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Tate v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  4. Voudrie v. Southern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  5. Louisville & N. R. R. v. CunninghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. MullinSupreme Court of Florida · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API