Legal Opinion

Louisville & N. R. R. v. Cunningham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 4, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit.—Damages from loss of goods. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. George W. Brown, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

The appellee brought suit in assumpsit against the appellant, as a common carrier of goods, to recover her alleged damage for loss and injury to a car load of household furniture delivered by appellee to appellant at Memphis, Tennessee, for carriage to Chicago, Illinois, and recovered a verdict and judgment for $2,000.

The declaration consisted of the common counts and two special counts.

The special counts are based upon the common law duty of appellant, and do not seem to materially differ, except that in the first one it is charged that a part of the furniture became wholly lost, and in the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. MountsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Bell v. Union Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API