Caldwell v. . Bates
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil Aotiok, heard before Norwood, J., at Spring Term, 1895, of RobesoN Superior Court, on complaint and demurrer. The demurrer was overruled and defendants appealed. The facts are substantially the same as those governing the cases of Solomon v. Bates, ante, and Tate, Treasurer, v. Bates, ante.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
This case presents substantially the same points as Solomon v. Bates at this Term, the plaintiff in this case, as in that, being a depositor who had lost by the insolvency of the bank, and the defendants being the same in both cases. Corporate interests are increasing steadily in importance and have become intimately connected with every phase of life. It is necessary to define accurately the duties, rights and obligations of corporations and the responsibilities of their managers to the public and to their own stockholders. Without reiterating the reasoning and authorities in the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Houston v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Lillian Knitting Mills Co. v. EarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Minnis v. . SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Security National Bank v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.