State v. Murphy

Michael L. Murphy, a juvenile, appeals a trial court finding that to impose a sentence within the standard range of punishment would be a clear danger to society and that such a disposition would be a manifest injustice.

The issues presented are:

1. Should the State's motion to supplement the record be granted?

2. Was Murphy denied his right to accelerated appeal?

3. Did the trial court err when it considered the probation officer's unsworn testimony during the disposition hearing?

4. Was Murphy given adequate notice of the possibility of a "manifest injustice" finding?

5. Does RCW 13.40.150 limit…