Legal Opinion

In re Appeal of Cliffside Leasing Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 25, 1997No. 96-391PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cliffside Leasing Company, Inc. appeals from a ruling of the Environmental Court that Cliffside’s ap*570plication for a building permit was subject to major-impact review under the City of Burlington’s zoning ordinances. Because the appeal is not from a final judgment, and Cliffside failed to seek interlocutory review, the appeal must be dismissed.

In May of 1995, Cliffside applied to the City’s Planning Department for a zoning/ building permit to construct a truck terminal on Flynn Avenue. The Department informed Cliffside that the site contained “designated wetlands or natural areas of state or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re J.G.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. Woodard v. Porter Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  3. Hospitality Inns v. South Burlington R.I.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  4. Morissette v. MorissetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. In Re SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Larkin v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  4. In re Stowe Highlands Merger/Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Jeffrey D. Hayes and Deborah Hayes McGraw v. Mountain View Estates Homeowners AssociationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API