Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Stowe Highlands Merger/Subdivision Application

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 11, 2013No. 2012-100PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

¶ 1. This appeal stems from the latest litigation involving developer Stowe Highlands and its Resort Planned Unit Development (PUD) in the Town of Stowe. The Stowe Development Review Board (DRB) denied Stowe Highlands’ application to amend the PUD by subdividing and then merging certain lots, including one designated for a hotel. The DRB concluded that the amendment amounted to a change in the permit conditions and that such amendment was not warranted because Stowe Highlands had not demonstrated an unanticipated change in factual circumstances beyond its control. Stowe Highlands appealed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  3. In Re KostenblattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. In Re Appeal of 232511 Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. In Re Stowe Highlands Resort PUD to PRD ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Willowell Foundation Conditional Use Certificate of Occupancy (Andrew Higbee, Jr. and Sheryl Knauth, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. 1472 Maple St ZBA Appeal - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2019
  3. 210 Fishkill Permit Appeal - Decision on MotionVermont Superior Court · 2024
  4. Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on MotionsVermont Superior Court · 2019
  5. Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250Vermont Superior Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API