Legal Opinion

State v. Garza

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1999No. S-98-057, S-98-058PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Pedro D. Garza, was convicted by a jury of several drug-related offenses, possession of a stolen firearm, use of a firearm to commit a felony, and use of a deadly weapon to commit a felony. Garza appeals, contending that the district court erred in, inter alia, determining that the evidence was sufficient to find Garza guilty of the use of a firearm and use of a weapon counts. We conclude that to sustain a conviction for “use” of a weapon under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1205 (Reissue 1995), the State must show that a defendant actively employed the weapon for the purpose of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. State v. FairclothNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. OldsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. DeckerNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. State v. KnutsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BoslauNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API