Legal Opinion

Nasfell v. Ogden City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1952No. 7628PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*345HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a declaratory judgment holding the following Ogden City ordinance valid:

Sec. 27g67: Owner prima facie responsible for illegal parking.

“The presence of a vehicle in or upon any public street or highway in Ogden City stopped, standing or parking in violation of any ordinance of Ogden City, shall be prima facie evidence that the person in whose name such vehicle is registered as owner committed or authorized the commission of such violation.”

The judgment is reversed with costs to appellant.

This case is here on stipulated facts. A car registered in plaintiff’s name…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. SutterUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. American Fork City v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Gronlund v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Walton v. Tracy Loan & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ritholz v. City of Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Allgood v. LarsonUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Moss Ex Rel. State Tax Commission v. Board of Com'rsUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Lark v. WhiteheadUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Red Top Driv-Ur-Self v. PottsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API