Legal Opinion
People v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1997No. H013671PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WUNDERLICH, J.
I. Statement of the Case
Thomas Alexander Hill and Angela Yvet Tinsley (Tinsley) were jointly charged with five counts of forging checks. (Pen. Code, § 470. 1 Defendant Hill (defendant) was separately charged with one misdemeanor count of concealing or destroying evidence. (§ 135.) It was also alleged that he had a prior serious felony conviction for robbery, which constituted a “strike" within the meaning of the three strikes law. (§ 667, subds. (b)-(i).)
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of all counts, and the trial court found true…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re SassounianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. AvenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MathewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- State v. PetejaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- David, SholomoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2022
- In re R.C.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. MathewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998