Legal Opinion

Miller v. Stine

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1936No. 13489PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

This is an application to the court by Estell Miller, a feme sole, for a writ of mandamus against .the Honorable Vincent Stine, judge of the Ninety-seventh judicial district court, requiring him to enter judgment in favor of relator in a case pending in that court bearing docket No. 8430, styled Estell Miller v. R. L. McClure.

It is stated in the application that on April 15, 1933, the cause was tried to a jury upon three special issues; that the jury did not answer the first issue, but did answer the other two; that the court declared a mis*398trial in the case because the first…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hall v. FieldsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Haymond v. HaymondTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Schulz v. L. E. Whitham & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Hanes v. HanesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Tackaberry v. City National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Friske v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Service Parts Co. v. BizzellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Woodmen of World Life Ins. Co. v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Jones v. State Fair of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API