Legal Opinion

Kiser v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1938PublishedCited by 35 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

The Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, the defendant in the trial court and the defendant in error here, who will hereafter be referred to as the defendant, is a labor organization, and its agents and organizers came to the city of Staunton, Virginia, in 1934, for the purpose of securing members and organizing the workers employed in the men’s clothing industry, which craft was its specialty.

In the early part of 1935, the plaintiff in error, Mrs. D. A. Kiser, the plaintiff in the trial court and who will hereafter be referred to as the plaintiff, was employed by the firm L. Grief…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Storm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Manss-Owens Co. v. H. S. Owens & SonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. New River Mineral Co. v. PainterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. McIntyre Lumber & Export Co. v. Jackson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HedrickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  3. Krikorian v. DaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Barger v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1984
  5. Collins v. Parsons CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API