Legal Opinion

Green Quarries, Inc. v. Raasch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1984No. WD 33356PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NUGENT, Judge.

Plaintiff Green Quarries, Inc., a subcontractor, filed its third amended petition, a petition in quantum meruit, attempting to enforce a mechanic’s lien on real property owned by defendants Ernie and Emelia Raasch under a theory of unjust enrichment. The trial court granted the defendant owners’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be *263granted, and the plaintiff subcontractor appeals this dismissal. We affirm.

The scope of review for a motion to dismiss requires an examination of the pleadings, allowing them their broadest in-tendment, treating…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Paschall's, Inc. v. DozierTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Porter v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Shapiro v. Columbia Union National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Laughlin v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lipton Realty, Inc. v. St. Louis Housing AuthorityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Guarantee Electric Co. v. Big Rivers Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987
  3. Comp & Soft, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Bennett Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. NationsBank of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Patrick v. Koepke Construction, Inc. v. Woodsage Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API