Legal Opinion

Dixon Venture v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 21, 1989PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

235 N.J. Super. 105 (1989)

561 A.2d 663

THE DIXON VENTURE, A NEW JERSEY PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

THE JOSEPH DIXON CRUCIBLE COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DIXON TICONDEROGA COMPANY, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, AND THEIR SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 1, 1989.

Decided July 21, 1989.

Before Judges KING, ASHBEY and SKILLMAN.

David B. Rubin argued the cause for appellant (Rubin, Rubin & Malgran, attorneys; David B. Rubin, on the brief).

John K. Enright argued the cause for respondents (Kirsten, Simon, Friedman,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Superior Air Prod. Co. v. NL Industries, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. Lower Main Street Associates v. New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance AgencySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Caparrelli v. Rolling Greens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. T & E IND. v. Safety Light Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Titan Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Public Interest Research Group v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Johnson MacHinery Co., Inc. v. Manville Sales Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. Dixon Ticonderoga Company, in No. 99-6054 v. Estate of William F. O'COnnOr Schumann Hession Kennelly & Dorment Schumann Hanlon & Panepinto Harold Friedman Kirsten, Simon, Friedman, Allen, Cherin & Lutkin Greenberg Margolis Franzblau Dratch & Friedman Stryker Tams & Dill Schumann Hanlon O'COnnOr & McCrossin Harold Friedman Stryker Tams & Dill, Third-Party v. Decotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck Connolly Epstein Chicco Foxman Engelmyer & Ewing Steven J. Engelmyer Lisa E. Brody, Third-Party Harold Friedman, in No. 99-6055 Franzblau Dratch, F/k/a Greenberg Margolis, in No. 99-6056Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Dixon Venture v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API