Legal Opinion

Dixon Venture v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 30, 1991PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons stated in its reported opinion below. 235 N.J.Super. 105, 561 A.2d 663 (1989). We modify the judgment to allow the court below to mold the pleadings to conform to the unique circumstances of this case. The case concerns the status of a purchaser of industrial property who agreed to buy the property during a window of time that began before the effective date of the Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act (ECRA), N.J.S.A. 13:lK-6 to -13, but did not close title to the property until February 28, 1984, two months…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Medivox Prod., Inc. v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. Edwards v. LeopoldiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Dixon Venture v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. T & E Industries, Inc. v. Safety Light Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. Public Interest Research Group v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  4. Johnson MacHinery Co., Inc. v. Manville Sales Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. Dixon Ticonderoga Company, in No. 99-6054 v. Estate of William F. O'COnnOr Schumann Hession Kennelly & Dorment Schumann Hanlon & Panepinto Harold Friedman Kirsten, Simon, Friedman, Allen, Cherin & Lutkin Greenberg Margolis Franzblau Dratch & Friedman Stryker Tams & Dill Schumann Hanlon O'COnnOr & McCrossin Harold Friedman Stryker Tams & Dill, Third-Party v. Decotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck Connolly Epstein Chicco Foxman Engelmyer & Ewing Steven J. Engelmyer Lisa E. Brody, Third-Party Harold Friedman, in No. 99-6055 Franzblau Dratch, F/k/a Greenberg Margolis, in No. 99-6056Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API