McGinnis v. Robinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
While in sharp conflict with evidence offered by defendant, the evidence offered by plaintiff was sufficient to support her allegations that the collision and her injuries were proximately caused by the negligence of the operator of the Mercury; and, although there was no direct evidence, the circumstantial evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, was, in our opinion, sufficient to support a finding that defendant was operating the Mercury when the collision occurred. See Stegall v. Sledge, 247 N.C. 718, 722, 102 S.E. 2d 115; Bridges v. Graham, 246 N.C. 371, 377, 98…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Childress v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Stegall v. SledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Caudle v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Baker v. MALAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Hardee v. Charles Worth YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Mason Ex Rel. Mason v. GillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Modern Electric Company v. DennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.