Legal Opinion
Hall v. Harker
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1999No. G020262PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALLIN, Acting P. J.
This action for malicious prosecution against James G. Harker, an attorney, presents the question whether alleged bias, on the part of the trial judge towards attorneys in general and the defendant in particular requires reversal. We conclude it does.
Procedural History
Dudley Taylor, a real estate broker, lived in Paso Robles in 1985. In February 1986, he went to work for Troy Investment Fund (Troy) as marketing director for Troy’s real estate development projects in Southern California. Taylor signed a series of one-page contracts for base salary plus commission per…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Ludwig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hayter Trucking, Inc. v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Robbins v. BlecherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. NievesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Hernandez v. PaiciusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.