Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Paicius

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 2003No. G029961PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Miguel Hernandez (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment after jury trial of his medical malpractice action against Richard M. Paicius, M.D. (defendant). Plaintiff contends the court erred in denying motions in limine relating to evidence of his alienage and psychological condition. He further asserts the court improperly denied his motion to disqualify defense counsel and declare a mistrial based on counsel’s misconduct. As we discuss, post, the court’s denial of the motion regarding alienage and the motion for mistrial compel reversal.

First, we note the remarks of the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. BabbittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. ScheidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Catchpole v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. TXI Transportation Co. v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Salas v. Hi-Tech ErectorsWashington Supreme Court · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API