Legal Opinion
Harris v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 6, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-2936PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, eleven supervisory housing inspectors in the District of Columbia’s Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, have moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of eligibility for overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA” or “the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (1982). Plaintiffs here claim that a District leave policy that subjects their salaries, in certain circumstances, to deductions for absences of less than one day effectively entitles them to overtime compensation under the FLSA and its underlying…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Knecht v. City of Redwood CityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1987
- D'CAMERA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Hodgson v. BARGE, WAGGONER AND SUMNER, INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lynn Martin, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Abshire v. County of KernCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Janet Klein v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- John J. Kinney, Jr. v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Michigan Association of Governmental Employees David Clifton Ronald Baptist Bettye Cox and Cornell Howard v. Michigan Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.