Legal Opinion

In Re Robinson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1998No. 96-BG-1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

On December 19, 1990, this court disbarred petitioner on the basis of his misappropriation of client funds and dishonesty. In re Robinson, 583 A.2d 691 (D.C.1990) (per curiam) {Robinson I). By a letter dated August 7, 1995, petitioner applied to the Board on Professional Responsibility for reinstatement. A hearing committee received evidence on the petition and, in a lengthy opinion, recommended that it be denied. The Board, over the dissent of three members, also recommended denial. We deny the petition for reinstatement. 1

I

Petitioner misappropriated a relatively…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. In Re E. David HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re SaboDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In Re ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re ReynoldsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. In re Mba-JonasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API