Legal Opinion
In re Mba-Jonas
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 2015No. 14-BG-607PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Having found by clear and convincing evidence that petitioner, Victor Mba-Jo-nas, failed to satisfy any of the criteria for reinstatement outlined in In re Roundtree, 503 A.2d 1215, 1217 (D.C.1985), the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (“Hearing Committee”) recommended that Mr. Mba-Jo-nas’ petition for reinstatement be denied. The Board on Professional Responsibility took no exception to the Hearing Committee’s recommendation. We accept the Hearing Committee’s recommendation.
I
The Maryland Court of Appeals indefinitely suspended Mr. Mba-Jonas from the practice of law in Maryland with the right to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-JonasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- In re SamadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mba-JonasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Karen P. Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re JosephDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- In re: Robert W. Mance, IIIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017