Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant insurer. ORCP 47. He argues that there is an issue of material fact as to whether defendant waived its right to rely on the policy limitation period for filing an action. We reverse.
Plaintiff owns a house that is insured under a fire insurance policy issued by defendant. In July, 1989, he rented the home to Pixler for approximately four months. On October 15, 1990, plaintiff was informed by police that a woman had confessed to having “cooked” methamphetamine at plaintiffs house while Pixler lived there. Plaintiff reported a claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Nathan Miller, Inc. v. Northern InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1944
- Fisher v. TiffinOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Lamorie v. Warner Pacific CollegeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Akins v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992