Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1992No. J4942; CA A69541Published

1DissentDurham, J.

The majority holds that the preliminary hearing required by ORS 109.560(1) may be, and was, waived by the minor’s request that the court grant a decree of emancipation “immediately.” I dissent, because both of those conclusions are incorrect.

*139ORS 109.5601 requires both apreliminary and a final hearing on a minor’s application for emancipation. Subsection (1) requires the court to conduct the preliminary hearing within 10 days after the filing of the application for emancipation. Subsection (4) requires the court to advise the minor at the preliminary hearing of the minor’s criminal and civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Oregon Business Planning Council v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Moore v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API