Legal Opinion

Warnock v. Kraft

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1938No. Civ. 11942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant predicated upon the granting of defendant’s motion for a nonsuit in an action to recover damages for malpractice.

So far as material the essential facts are:

June 22, 1936, plaintiff received personal injuries while riding on a drag attached to a tractor. He was unconscious for several days and among other injuries suffered a dislocation of one of his toes. Defendant, a physician and surgeon practicing in the city of Pasadena, who treated him, failed to have an X-ray taken of plaintiff’s foot, although plaintiff frequently complained of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turner v. StokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Sampson v. VeenboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Rasmussen v. ShickleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Willard v. NorcrossSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  5. Tennant v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. BoydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Gambill v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. People v. BastioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Robbins v. FooterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API