Sutherland v. Auch Inter-Borough Transit Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
1. Plaintiffs Donald Sutherland and Phyllis Brynjulson Sutherland, husband and wife, were citizens of the State of New York residing at 126 Jamesville Avenue, Syracuse, New York at the time this action was filed.
2. Defendant Aueh Inter-Borough Transit Company (hereafter Auch) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Pennsylvania with its princi pal place of business located at 1516 Fayette Street, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
3. The amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $10,000 exclusive of costs.
4. On May 11,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scott v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Grayson v. Irvmar Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Schulz v. Reading Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by32 opinions
- Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Kirk v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Stager v. SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Sawyer v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Feliciano v. Rosemar Silver Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.