Gottesman v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
By virtue of Section 3714, General Code, a municipality is required to keep its public grounds open, in repair and free from nuisance. Since parks owned and controlled by a municipality and maintained for the use and enjoyment of the general public are public grounds, -the duty imposed by statute rested upon defendant herein. City of Cleveland v. Ferrando, 114 Ohio St., 207, 150 N. E., 747. There is, however, no evidence of defendant’s failure to- keep the park itself in repair and so, regardless of the construction placed upon the statute, there was no issue to submit to the jury as to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Hanna v. StollOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Cleveland v. FerrandoOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Degroodt v. SkrbinaOhio Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by22 opinions
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Smith v. FlesherOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Fahey v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Terranella v. Union Building & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Gabris v. BlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.