Legal Opinion

Tiholiz v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1980No. Civ. No. 58338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

Petitioner is the defendant and real parties in interest (RPIs) are the plaintiffs in action No. NWC 50691 now pending in respondent superior court (pending action). Petitioner requests this court to mandate respondent court to dismiss the pending action because the record shows without dispute that RPIs did not as required by the settled construction of Code of Civil Procedure sections 583, subdivision (b) or 583, subdivision (c)1 bring the pending action to trial before the expiration of the time fixed by either section.

In pertinent part section 583, subdivision (b)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Reeves v. HutsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Langan v. McCorkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Maguire v. CollierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Vanyek v. HeardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Misic v. SegarsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API