Legal Opinion

Tobacco Growers Association v. . Harvey Son Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VARSER, J., did not sit. The plaintiff alleges that L. O. Pollock, a former cultivating tobacco, and Loftin, Haddock, Brown, Jerkins, Hill and Parker, his tenants, are members of the plaintiff association, all having executed the marketing agreement set out in Exhibit "A" and having delivered to the association a part of the tobacco raised by them in 1922 and 1923, and that in violation of their agreement they sold a portion to parties other than the plaintiff and in December, 1923, announced their purpose not to deliver any more of their tobacco to the plaintiff association. For this reason…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Commissioners of Stanly CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Cobb v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Rigsbee v. Town of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. Jones v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Bell v. DanzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Co. v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949
  2. Lance v. CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Bowles v. Inland Empire Dairy Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
  5. Bishop v. Alabama Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API