Legal Opinion

United States v. Windrix

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 3, 2005No. 04-5016, 04-5020, 04-5021PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated cases arise from the trial of three participants in a conspiracy to manufacture and sell methamphetamine. Defendants Morgan Earl Windrix, Charles Arnold Mook, and David Alan Westcott were each convicted of conspiring to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 846, and possessing equipment and chemicals for methamphetamine manufacturing, 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(6). Win-drix, the conspiracy’s leader, was further convicted on two counts of possessing methamphetamine with the intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 843, and maintaining a drug house, 21…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. ShareefCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Williams v. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API