Callicoat v. Acuff Homes, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is a civil action seeking recovery of monies for damage to residential property. The judgment is affirmed.
Appellants present four points which, in summary, charge the trial court erred (1) in granting summary judgment for respondents on appellants’ claim of fraud; (2) in abusing its discretion by refusing appellants’ request to recall a witness; (3) in granting a summary judgment for respondents on appellants’ claim that respondents violated the Merchandising Practices Law; and (4) in submitting the verdict-directing instruction.
The record discloses the following pertinent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Detling v. EdelbrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- St. John Bank & Trust Co. v. City of St. JohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schimmer v. H. W. Freeman Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. MoraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mobley v. CopelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Baltzell v. Van BuskirkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Grossoehme v. CordellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. WernekeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hollingsworth v. QuickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.