Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Copeland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1992No. 17573PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Presiding Judge.

The plaintiff, Gilbert L. Mobley, appeals from a summary judgment denying his claims for damages arising out of his purchase of residential real estate from the defendants Donald D. Copeland and Jan L. Copeland. Count I of the plaintiff’s petition was based on allegations of fraud; Count III on allegations of a breach of an implied warranty of habitability. 1

At issue on appeal is whether, considering the record before the trial court, there exists a genuine issue of material fact concerning the plaintiffs allegations that the defendants made fraudulent representations…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Smith v. Old Warson Development CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Ackmann v. Keeney-Toelle Real Estate CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Gast v. EbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. Nastasio v. CinnamonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Smith v. Foerster-Bolser Construction, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Koger v. Hartford Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Ringstreet Northcrest, Inc. v. BisanzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. VanBooven v. SmullMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Reeves v. KeeslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API