Legal Opinion

Artinano v. W. R. Grace & Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 9, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, District Judge.

This is an action at law for the recovery of damages alleged to have been sustained as the result of the illegal arrest, in admiralty proceedings, by the defendant, of the steamship Consuelo, belonging to the plaintiff. The action was begun by the filing of a notice of motion for judgment, to which the defendant demurs on the ground that no cause of action is sufficiently shown. The notice charges that on July 29, 1921, the Spanish steamship Consuelo, belonging to the plaintiff, was then lying in Hampton Roads; that on the day mentioned the defendant wrongfully,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Portland Shipping Co. v. The Alex GibsonDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1890
  3. The AlcaldeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1904
  4. The Swedish Bark AdolphDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
  5. Henderson v. Three Hundred Tons of Iron OreU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frontera Fruit Co. v. DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  2. Grand Bahama Petroleum Co. v. Canadian Transportation Agencies, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
  3. United States v. M/V PITCAIRNDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  4. Walsh Transp. Co. v. Iroquois Transit Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  5. Applewhaite v. S. S. SunprincessDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API