The Swedish Bark Adolph
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Choate, D. J.
In this, which is a suit of damage by collision, the claimant of the bark Adolph has had a decree dismissing the libel, with costs, and the libellant has given notice of appeal to the circuit court. Before the expiration of the 10 days allowed by the practice of the court for the marshal to retain the vessel in his custody, the claimant, on affidavit by his proctor that he is unable to give bond for the value of the vessel, lias applied to the court for an order directing the marshal to release the vessel, or in the alternative for an order directing such release, unless the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Lewis F. Stevens and Elvira B. Stevens v. F/v Bonnie Doon, Her Engines, MacHinery Tackle, Etc. Gene Koblick, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Artinano v. W. R. Grace & Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1923
- Gow v. William W. Brauer S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1902
- Watt v. Cargo of LumberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. M/T HOEGH FORUMDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.