Legal Opinion
The Alcalde
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 24, 1904No. 344PublishedCited by 8 opinions
In Admiralty. Libel in rem for money advanced to the master at the termination of a voyage, and by him applied to the payment of claims against the ship, including wages for his own past services. Hearing on the merits. Decree for the claimant.
1Opinion of the Court
HANFORD, District Judge.
For a statement of this case I quote from the written argument filed in the case in behalf , of the libelant, as follows:
“This suit is one brought by libelant to recover from the schooner Alcalde the sum of $855.33, with interest from December 27, 1900, the same being for moneys advanced by libelant to O. H. White, the master of said vessel, at the port of San Pedro, California, between December 22 and December 27, 1900, which moneys were used by the master for the purpose of paying off claims of a maritime nature against said vessel, and which claims were a maritime…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The St. Jago De Cuba. Vinente, and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- The Emily SouderSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- The GrapeshotSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Thomas v. OsbornSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Gilbert Hubbard & Co. v. RoachU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frontera Fruit Co. v. DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Cline v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Fischer v. CareyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- The President ArthurDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
- The Minnie & EmmaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.