Aul v. Golden Rule Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. Thomas and Mary Patricia Aul are engaged in a dual battle: against Patricia's breast cancer and against Golden Rule Insurance Company for coverage of her treatment. They appeal the summary judgment granted in favor of Golden Rule, *234which had issued them a group health policy when Patricia was being medically followed for a breast cyst. The policy included a rider, to which the Auls had reluctantly acquiesced, excluding coverage for loss Patricia might incur from "any disease or disorder of the breasts." When Patricia developed breast cancer nearly two years later and Golden Rule denied…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kenseth v. DEAN HEALTH PLAN, INC.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- U.S. Oil Co. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- Cottonwood Financial, Ltd. v. EstesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Naparala v. Pella Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Aul v. Golden Rule InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.