Legal Opinion

Becker v. Adams

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1962PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jacobs, J.

The plaintiffs are inhabitants of the defendant Township of Woodbridge and reside in sections of the township known as Port Reading and Sewaren. On May 1, 1961 they and other residents of Port Reading and Sewaren submitted a petition under the 1895 Act for the Incorporation of Cities. See L. 1895, c. 269, pp. 551-555—R. S. 40:168-6 through R. S. 40:168-12. The petition was submitted to the Chairman of the Township Committee and requested, in effect, that an election be held to determine whether the Port Reading and Sewaren sections should be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Rocker v. Cardinal Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Camden v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  3. Van De Kamp v. GumbinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Campus Communications, Inc. v. EarnhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Meadowlands Reg. Dev. Agency v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API