Barr v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Claimant filed on September 27,1967, the standard claim form furnished by the defendant entitled, “Workmen’s and Employer’s Report of Occupational Injury or Disease.”
Shortly after filing the claim this 57-year-old man was operated upon for the excision of nucleus pulposus between the third and fourth and the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae.
On October 17, 1967, the State Compensation Department denied the claim because:
“* * * (1) there is insufficient evidence that said workman sustained accidental personal injury within the meaning of the provisions of the Oregon Workmen’s Compensation law,
“…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Schulz v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oregon Medical Ass'n v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Buster v. Chase Bag Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Mendenhall v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Hammond v. ALBINA ENGINE & MACHINE WORKS, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Compensation of Jones v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.