State v. Copeland
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
The case on appeal contains no assignments of error. In the brief, defense counsel states that he is unable to find prejudicial error but has perfected the appeal to the end that this Court may examine the entire record.
The appeal itself is considered an exception to the judgment and presents for review any error appearing on the face of the record proper. State v. Cox, 281 N.C. 131, 187 S.E. 2d 785 (1972); State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E. 2d 330 (1967). Unless error appears on the face of the record proper, the judgment will be sustained. State v. Bumgarner, 283 N.C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. TinsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.