Legal Opinion

(PC) Mays v. Stanton Correctional Facility

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 8, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02339Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SEAN TAYLOR MAYS, No. 2:23-cv-2339 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a Solano County jail inmate, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff 18 seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now before the 20 court. 21 Plaintiff’s allegations are essentially the same as he pled in his original complaint.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API