Legal Opinion
Eidson v. Pierce
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 24, 1984No. Nos. 83-2414, 83-2559PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
These two consolidated appeals concern the due process dimensions of the denials of plaintiffs’ applications to rent housing owned and operated by defendant private owners. The housing is subsidized by the federal government under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (1982) (“Section 8”). The central feature of the Section 8 programs at issue here is that private landlords agree to rent their property to eligible low-income families, and in return, the federal government contracts with the landlord to pay the difference between a fair…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Thurber v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Washington Legal Clinic for the Homeless v. Marion S. Barry, Jr., Mayor of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Giaimo v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Audrey Price v. Samuel PierceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.