Legal Opinion

Ro-Med Construction Co. v. Clyde M. Bartley Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeal, No. 441PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Van der Voort, J.,

Appeal is taken from an Order of the lower court dismissing preliminary objections of appellant. Appellant’s objection as to proper venue is the only issue before us.

The record shows that appellee filed a complaint in assumpsit as above-captioned, averring that the corporate defendant had an office in Lawrence County and *313that the individual defendant resided in Lawrence County. Appellant objected preliminarily that venue was improperly laid as to it, alleging that its registered place of business was Beaver County and that the performance of the contract involved…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caplan v. Keystone Weaving Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Pincus v. Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Hohlstein v. HohlsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Wilcox v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Levinson v. LevinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sehl v. NeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Peaceman v. CadesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. McLain v. Arneytown Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Oswald v. OldsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Schachtel v. BlocheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API