Pincus v. Mutual Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Nix,
Appellees Erwin and Hinda Pincus are shareholder-policyholders in the appellant insurance company. They instituted this suit as a class action on behalf of all shareholders alleging that the company directors had wrongfully withheld some $10,000,000.00 in corporate reserves and seeking distribution of that sum to the shareholders. Appellants filed preliminary objections asserting: (1) that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the individual defendants due to a defect in service of process; and (2) that the individual plaintiffs did not adequately represent the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Mary Anne Walsh v. City of Detroit, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Branch v. FoortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
3Cited by46 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Alessandro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.