Legal Opinion

Pincus v. Mutual Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1974No. Appeal, 485PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Nix,

Appellees Erwin and Hinda Pincus are shareholder-policyholders in the appellant insurance company. They instituted this suit as a class action on behalf of all shareholders alleging that the company directors had wrongfully withheld some $10,000,000.00 in corporate reserves and seeking distribution of that sum to the shareholders. Appellants filed preliminary objections asserting: (1) that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the individual defendants due to a defect in service of process; and (2) that the individual plaintiffs did not adequately represent the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Reifsnyder v. Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Mary Anne Walsh v. City of Detroit, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Branch v. FoortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Alessandro v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API