Legal Opinion

Oswald v. Olds

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1985No. 00813PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from an order sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections in an action over the right to the proceeds of a life insurance policy. The Court of Common Pleas of Washington County concluded that venue over this case did not lie with it. 1 The court erred in that regard. We hold that venue was proper.

On the substantive issue concerning the change in beneficiary and the proceeds of an insurance policy, we note that once appellant had notice of the beneficiary change, she should then have challenged that alteration, a right given her under the Divorce Code. In the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company Of Philadelphia v. Selma EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Upperman v. UppermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Slezynger v. BischakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Haviland v. HavilandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Lazovitz v. LazovitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Reese v. ReeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Gleed v. NoonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Pope v. CauffmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API