Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
In this case involving the enforcement of a predispute arbitration clause in a client agreement executed in the purchase of securities, we address the procedures by which petitions to compel arbitration (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2) are to be determined in the superior courts. We conclude that while the client agreements here are subject to the United States Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16), the federal provision for a jury trial of questions regarding the existence of an arbitration agreement (9 U.S.C. § 4) does not operate in California state courts. We further conclude…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Shubin v. William Lyon Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- DKS, Inc. v. Corporate Business Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- DKS, Inc. v. Corporate Business Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Fresno-Madera Fed'l Land Bank v. Aron MargosianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.