Legal Opinion

Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1996No. S050952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In this case involving the enforcement of a predispute arbitration clause in a client agreement executed in the purchase of securities, we address the procedures by which petitions to compel arbitration (Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.2) are to be determined in the superior courts. We conclude that while the client agreements here are subject to the United States Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16), the federal provision for a jury trial of questions regarding the existence of an arbitration agreement (9 U.S.C. § 4) does not operate in California state courts. We further conclude…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Shubin v. William Lyon Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. DKS, Inc. v. Corporate Business Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. DKS, Inc. v. Corporate Business Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Fresno-Madera Fed'l Land Bank v. Aron MargosianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API