DKS, Inc. v. Corporate Business Solutions, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Corporate Business Solutions (CBS) appeals the district court’s order denying a motion to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16, and we affirm.
*739“We review the denial of a motion to compel arbitration de novo. Underlying factual findings are reviewed for clear error, while the interpretation and meaning of contract provisions are reviewed de novo.” Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc., 763 F.3d 1171, 1175 (9th Cir. 2014) (internal quotations and citations omitted). CBS primarily argues that the district court misapplied the doctrine of “fraud in the inception” to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Duick v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996