Legal Opinion
Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Su
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 10, 2017No. 2:15–cv–0924–KJM–EFBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kimberly Mueller, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Several California railroad employers sue the California Labor Commissioner, seeking a declaration that federal law preempts provisions of a local paid sick leave law. Before the court are three cross-motions for partial summary judgment raising the question whether the *1133Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq. ("RUIA"), preempts California's Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014 ("California Act"). See ECF Nos. 49, 51, 53. The court heard all three motions on January 19, 2017. Hr'g Mins., ECF No. 67. As discussed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CSX Transp., Inc. v. HealeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- ArcBest II, Inc. v. OliverDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. State of CADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021