CSX Transp., Inc. v. Healey
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the CourtGorton, J.
*262This case arises from allegations that the Massachusetts Earned Sick Time Law ("ESTL") at M.G.L. c. 149 § 148C, approved by Massachusetts voters in 2014, is preempted by three federal statutes.
Pending before the Court are three renewed cross-motions filed by the plaintiffs, the defendant and the intervenors for summary judgment on Count 1 which asserts that the ESTL is expressly preempted by the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act ("RUIA"), 45 U.S.C. § 351, et seq. For the reasons that follow, the motion for partial summary judgment by plaintiffs will be allowed and the motions for partial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nat'l Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Julie SuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Nat'l Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Julie SuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022