ArcBest II, Inc. v. Oliver

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ArcBest II, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00627-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Nicholas Oliver, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff asserts a California statute regulating the moving industry is preempted by 18 | federal law. Defendants move to dismiss, and both parties move for summary judgement. For 19 | the reasons explained below, the court grants the motion to dismiss in part. Additionally, the 20 | court grants plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in part and grants defendants’ 21 | motion for…