Legal Opinion

Pantel v. Becker

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1977PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge L. Cobb, J.

Defendants Becker and High Green Corporation move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint herein and defendant Cowan cross-moves for similar relief as well as for summary judgment upon his cross claim against defendant Becker.

The complaint charges that the plaintiff owns 40% of the stock of the defendant corporation and in the first and second causes of action in the complaint, alleges an agreement among the stockholders of the defendant corporation which, in effect, conferred upon each of them first refusal rights if any other stockholder wished to sell his stock to the extent that a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Silverman v. Alcoa Plaza AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. In re WaldsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Cohn, Ivers & Co. v. GrossAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1968
  4. Furlo v. CheekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gross v. VogelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Wamser v. BambergerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. In Re Domestic Fuel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Matter of SandeferUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
  5. Morris v. People's Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API